Should gays and lesbians be allowed to serve in the U.S. military Research Paper

Should gays and lesbians be allowed to serve in the U.S. military - Research Paper Example The constitution of the United States does not offer just anyone an absolute right to serve in the countries military services. Joining the military in United States is considered a privilege and demands particular conditions to be met by the prospect candidate. Anyone who meets the required conditions and sings up as a member of the military in the active duty is serves on full-time basis. All members whether men or women report on their duties if they qualify to specific age and physical conditions. The lower entry to military service is under seventeen while the upper entry is thirty five years. However entry may depend on conditions of a particular category. They issue of gays and lesbians serving in the military should not be a problem of contention and so they should be allowed as suggested by Stewart (53). Since they are qualified individuals just like any others in the military there is no reason as to why they should not be allowed in the military. The issue about gays and l esbians in the military of US has been highly debated upon in politics. This started after the court declared the Don’t ask, Don’t tell policy of the military. ... The liberals have no problem with gays and lesbians serving the military but the conservatives want to ban the issue. Before President Clinton came into power, the department of Finance had its own policy which did not allow gays and lesbians to serve in the military. Once one was investigated and found quilt of this, he/she was discharged from the military. Clinton had promised in his campaigns to overthrow the policy but it was not possible and law was enacted which forbid homosexuality forever. However despite the enactment, homosexuality is still going on in the military. This can be attributed to the fact that some of the low-ranked persons in the army, live with their roommates in the barrack. Therefore, because it has become impossible to totally eliminate homosexuality in the military, it can thus be allowed. Since individuals are not born gays or lesbians, it does not matter in the service delivery. As suggested by Newton (53), this is because lesbianism or gay practice is n ot a weakness but more of lifestyle. Serving in the military means that one is dedicated to serve his/her country and is also willing to die for it. Therefore it is important to respect the private life of individuals if it has no negative impact in their service delivery. For instance, if those individuals outside the military are not investigated in their life then there is no reason as to why military individuals should be investigated. If homosexuality does not change the life of individuals then there is no way it can change their service delivery. For instance in some countries like the NATO countries gays have been openly allowed to work in the military even as leaders and there is no single effect since it was allowed. However people may argue that